Agreed. Thanks for the text proposal, Kyle! Tommy
> On Jul 18, 2017, at 12:15 PM, Brian Trammell (IETF) <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1. > > Cheers, > > Brian > >> On 18 Jul 2017, at 12:02, Michael Welzl <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Agree 100% - I think this proposal is exactly the right way to do it. >> >> Cheers, >> Michael >> >> >>> On Jul 18, 2017, at 11:12 AM, Kyle Rose <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Proposal: >>> >>> (1) Strike the last paragraph of the charter ("TAPS is not chartered to >>> perform detailed analysis..."). >>> >>> (2) Change the third bullet right above it to read "Extension, >>> modification, or creation of transport or security protocols" >>> >>> The idea being to permit analysis of the properties of security protocols >>> with respect to the requirements of TAPS systems, but not to permit >>> creation or customization of security protocols. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> Kyle >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Taps mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Taps mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps > > _______________________________________________ > Taps mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps _______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
