Hey, while I'm on here, can I ask that everyone try and remember to clip off the unnecessary text at the ends and just send responses? It gets a bit worrysome to read. Thanks. TB
On Dec 8, 8:05 pm, mistertaterbug <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmmm, I can't remember right off what those sound like, but I recall > some of those in there being mighty hard to beat. I heard one version > off an old Opry show that was about as fast as anything I've ever > heard. Bill just sounded like he was skipping on top of the water. I'm > doing the studio version(yes, the high part too). It's the one > everybody learned to start with. The live ones are numberous and > tasty, but I figured I'd go with the easiest one to find. I am already > finding surprises in it, things I've never heard these past three > decades. Plus, there's places where slides suffice for phrases, just a > glazing over a phrase and pouncing on the next chord. Egad. I don't > know how I'll figure out how to write those out. > > Onward... > TBug > > On Dec 8, 4:21 pm, Don <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'm sure the Tater version will have insights that the Dawg version > > does not have. Which version are you transcribing? The studio version > > is pretty definitive. Has anyone heard the Raw Hide live from > > Berryville VA, 1968? It's about the fiercest version I've ever heard. > > Then there's a version when Bill was rehearsing/auditioning Bill Keith > > & Del McCoury. Keith certainly pushed back on his break and Monroe > > really lays into it when he comes back in, but I guess that's really > > the nature of the tune. > > > Now it's back to trying to dig through 3 foot snowdrifts in my long > > driveway. Sure wish I had bought new tires for the 4WD. I need a > > tractor. > > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Robin Gravina <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > have to agree: I have to admit I never really looked at the up the neck > > > part, just the bending of the time on the lower part. Hope to return to > > > classes soon and get stuck in. Life can get in the way of working on what > > > you love... hmmm > > > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:42 PM, sgarrity <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I look forward to this transcription. Rawhide is a tune that I've > > >> been putting off for quite some time. I think that'll be my New > > >> Year's resolution, to learn a respectable version of Rawhide! > > > >> -- > > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > >> "Taterbugmando" group. > > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > >> [email protected]. > > >> For more options, visit this group at > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/taterbugmando?hl=en. > > > > -- > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "Taterbugmando" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]. > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/taterbugmando?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Taterbugmando" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/taterbugmando?hl=en.
