Topher, thanks for the thorough and thoughtful reply. It's clear
you've been around the horn on this. You're right that nailing the
intro and outro is key, and as I think about the breaks I do play
reliably well, I have in my head solid strategies for both. I'm a
melody person and any break I play is much more melodic than scalular
and arpeggiated (don't think those are real words, but you know what I
mean). I've always been reluctant to memorize breaks per se for all
the reasons you all are likely aware of but clearly hammering out a
solid road map is important. And I love Robin's notion of practicing
breaks. What a concept. Anyway, I really appreciate all your thoughts
(yours too Linda) and feel fired up with resolve to improve myself.
cheers, val

On Nov 10, 12:13 pm, Topher Gayle <[email protected]> wrote:
> On creating your break:
> ----------------------------------
> There are many approaches to this, so you'll have to try different
> things to see what works best for you. And also expect your approach
> to change over time as your interests and abilities change and grow.
>
> Some folks improvise the whole break from scratch, some carefully
> create a solo off-line and memorize it, some play a slightly
> ornamented version of the melody, and some mix up these ideas.
>
> In an arrangement which features several soloists, I think it makes
> musical sense to start close to the melody and then depart from it. So
> if one player tends to play close to the melody, start with them, and
> then get progressively crazier. But this is just one approach.
>
> Playing the melody (or something sort of like it) is always a good
> thing to do. When in doubt, this will work. And in fact I like to hear
> solos that reflect the melody from time to time. So even if your goal
> is free improvisation, or a composed not-quite-the-melody-break, I
> think it makes sense to be able to play the melody and insert
> recognizable bits of it into the break.
>
> All that said, I find there are two important things you can try to
> improve your odds of getting off to a good start on an improvised
> break. First, stop playing a few seconds before you start your break.
> No one will notice, usually, and it gives you a chance to think about
> when you want your break to start. You might want to start with some
> pickup notes. This gives you a little breathing room to get that ready
> to go. And it lets you find a good starting note, which is vital. If
> you put your finger on the wrong note to start, it can really
> discombobulate you.
>
> Second, it's good to have a little inventory of ending licks which
> typically are little notey flourishes, such as the Flatt G-run. They
> signal your listeners and bandmates that you are done done done.
>
> On practicing taking breaks:
> ----------------------------------------
> Your idea of practicing three breaks per tune is a very good one. If
> you tend to play single passes through the tune in your songs in
> performance, though, playing three breaks in a row might not give you
> the practice in beginning and ending that you might need, so I'd
> suggest you play one break per person in a circle and go around the
> whole circle three times to give you that much more practice in
> starting and stopping.
>
> Hope this was interesting.
>
> TopherOn Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 6:53 AM, Linda <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I am the last one to know anything worth sharing about breaks, but am
> > currently in a circumstance where I am asked to improvise over what
> > others are playing.  When I practice at home, its first, going to the
> > scale, then noodling on that.  Finding things that suggest or fit with
> > the tune.  Also I look and mess around with the notes in the given
> > chords and consider rhythm, a twist maybe.  Leaving something out or
> > suggested seems cool.   From the noodling, ideas seem to pop out.  I
> > don't really ever do breaks yet but am playing with someone who plays
> > claw-hammer  style banjo, old time tunes, occasionally.  I try to have
> > more than one take of the tune.  Seems like that is what a break
> > is...kinda, another take on the tune, a suggestion or comment on what
> > is already happening, like an aside, like in Shakespeare drama.  I
> > like to see notation of Monroe's ideas on old time tunes as there are
> > clues in there about breaks..for me anyway.  The other thing I do is
> > find a box position on the neck, using that position to play the
> > chords, and see what is nearby that sounds cool with the tune.
>
> >  I think if I were going to do a break, I would use a similar
> > approach, get a few things I like going and then go over that till I
> > have two or three things pat, up my sleeve that are interesting that
> > can be plugged into the tune, things that become part of that tune for
> > me.  Since I only have a few years experience, I can't go off the
> > cuff, so I just agree to do this work hoping it will eventually take
> > me there, to spontaneous efforts of genius.  HAR  All my stuff is
> > fairly simple and elementary now but building in complexity.  The
> > Tater said once that my vocabulary was not very large.  Its true.
> > After a while, I gather one could create great things off the cuff,
> > by knowing the key, the  given chords of a tune and its basic shape
> > and what its about.
>
> > I love doing the improv. thing.  Seems my own notes are easier to play
> > than those of any others. What I can make up, seems pretty good.  Its
> > an interesting and creative exercise.  It would be cool to read what
> > the Tater and other more experienced people have to say.  Good
> > question.
>
> > Val, I doubt any of this is useful to you but it gave me a chance to
> > clarify what I am up to.
> >  Robin, I feel like you do, re excitement of a break, its worse for
> > me if they are not my ideas, I don't seem to believe in the thing
> > unless I created it.
> > Linda
>
> > On Nov 11, 12:29 am, Robin Gravina <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Funny you should mention that. After realising that the excitement of
> >> launching into a break was making me speed up and lose timing, I spent
> >> yesterday working out and practicing breaks to some of our newer songs: It
> >> did seem to be useful to figure out something that sounds good in context
> >> using the various ideas that are in my head somewhere: I'm definitely not
> >> good enough to have those ideas in my fingers, and to be able to reproduce
> >> them on the cuff. Also, once you get confident about the learned break, it
> >> seems to be easier to improvise off of that, or at least to develop it with
> >> other ideas.
>
> >> But I speak as someone who is fumbling around with this!
>
> >> Also, what I realised recently is that in our group practices, we don't
> >> really practice solos, just play them: so we started doing each solo three
> >> times each time we play the song: I think it really helps to get that time
> >> to play something comfortably without the pressure of creating a 
> >> masterpiece
> >> in the one moment you have available....
>
> >> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Val Mindel <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > Anyone have advice on working up breaks? I'm feeling lame, in a wash
> >> > of post-gig angst on the subject. Singing is usually what I'm hired to
> >> > do, and I do lots of songs in less-than-friendly string keys (flat
> >> > keys, F#, like that). Obviously more practice is the ticket, but I
> >> > don't know how to practice. Should I create a break and then memorize
> >> > it or hope my musical vocabulary improves to the point I can spit out
> >> > something coherent in the moment. Oddly enough, I can usually manage a
> >> > fine or at least a passable off-the-cuff break in a jam, but when the
> >> > crunch comes all those good ideas seem inaccessible. val
>
> >> > --
> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >> > "Taterbugmando" group.
> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> > [email protected]<taterbugmando%[email protected]>
> >> > .
> >> > For more options, visit this group at
> >> >http://groups.google.com/group/taterbugmando?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "Taterbugmando" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/taterbugmando?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Taterbugmando" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/taterbugmando?hl=en.

Reply via email to