On Wed, 12 Apr 2000 00:13:50 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
DH>> To integrate flagging in sorting-office is a step in the right
DH>> direction...
> I don't see the point. If necesasary, I can sort messages into special
> folders instead of using a wide variety of flags. It makes it easier
> to keep an overview, don't you think? ;-)
Take this example. I filter a MIME digest to a particular
folder. I tend to read these digests only when I have the time. In
order to prevent them from having my bat flying continually, I filter
with the action to mark them as read. Because of this, at times I
don't know which ones I had read or not.
Enter flagging : I now filter them with an additional action
to flag them. 5 days later I open the relevant folder and the digests
that I haven't yet read are flagged and waiting. I'm doing this with
my spam folder as well. No more wondering which spam needs checking
and end up overshooting the check point to make sure I haven't missed
anything. Looking only at flagged messages and then unflagging them is
a lot more precise and decisive.
--
� Allie
� Using TB! v1.42 Beta/16 �� Win2k Pro
---
** Don't Take Life Seriously, It Is Not Permanent.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
