Rick wrote:
I'm not meaning improving IMAP is absurd. I saying the suggestion that
they should expend someone's time going line by line or table by table
on a thousand messages, because complaining users shouldn't be
bothered with calling their attention to any pages which are
problematic is absurd.
The way I understood is that they should install Outlook then make the bat render to that as a
standard. (I'm wincing as I say "Outlook" and "standard" in the same sentence.
:)
True. Outlook should definitely not be the standard. If I use outlook,
I find myself coming back to TB, to deal with
html replies. It might be that Outlook has better tools for writing
html. I wouldn't know because I don't use them.
But I do reply to html formatted messages, and Outlook hasn't improved
in that category for a long time. Can't insert
replies between chunks of split quoted html. Can't add reply text at
the bottom below quoted html. No good.
--
Gleason <http://www.getpostbox.com>
________________________________________________________
Current beta is 4.2.33.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
