On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Feli Wilcke <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm quite sure that TB is not the only mailclient that has a different method > for displaying HTML than Outlook.
Okay, but so what? All I said is that Outlook displays the HTML that I receive much better than TB. Since you don't receive my email, I think that I am a better authority on that subject than you are. :) > Here in Germany all tickets I get electronically are sent as PDF attachments. > So the airline can be sure that the representation is as they intended. Feli, please be kind enough to instruct Orbitz and Expedia that they must only send their tickets as PDF attachments to TB users . :) > Making Outlook the ultimate benchmark for HTML representation is the same as > it was some years ago... Feli, if you have a better benchmark/standard than Outlook, I am all for it. I'd like to see TB do better than Outlook, not just as good as Outlook. > Life is change, QED. No argument there... except I don't think that either you or Ritlabs earned a QED for that statement. As I see it, the fact that change is a constant in nature merely supports my position that Ritlabs should upgrade what is still only a somewhat primitive handling of HTML in TB. -- jaywalker Windows XP Pro SP3 The Bat! Pro 4.2.36.4 OTFE ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 4.2.33.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
