Dear Thomas, @9-May-2011, 00:28 +0700 (08-May 18:28 here) Thomas Fernandez [TOG] in mid:[email protected] said to Marck:
... <snip> MP>> I think TB may have lost the ability to decode inline UUE in the MP>> re-write. ... <snip> TOG> What's your opinion on this? Should TB! continue to decode UUE? I for TOG> one think so, for user-friendliness, even though the RFCs don't TOG> require it. Tough call. It has to be down to priorities. There are flaws and omissions relating to non-retro technologies that have to take pride of place in the programming queue. I'd put this one on a low priority myself. -- Cheers -- Marck D Pearlstone -- List moderator and fellow end user TB! v5.0.12.1 on Windows 7 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1 '
pgpvF0DFUcdne.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________________ Current beta is 5.0.12.1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
