Hello Marck, On Sun, 8 May 2011 18:35:07 +0100 GMT (09/May/11, 0:35 AM +0700 GMT), Marck Pearlstone wrote:
MP> ... <snip> MP>>> I think TB may have lost the ability to decode inline UUE in the MP>>> re-write. MP> ... <snip> TOG>> What's your opinion on this? Should TB! continue to decode UUE? I for TOG>> one think so, for user-friendliness, even though the RFCs don't TOG>> require it. MP> Tough call. It has to be down to priorities. There are flaws and MP> omissions relating to non-retro technologies that have to take pride MP> of place in the programming queue. I'd put this one on a low MP> priority myself. We have both made our points, the decision is now with Ritlabs. And then ultimately, with their paying customers and *their* priorities with reading emails and viewing attachments. -- Cheers, Thomas. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.2.44 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 5.0.12.1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
