-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On April 22, 2001, at 6:34:04 AM, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
MM> This beta now supports GnuPG.
Max, is the feature "Smart Matching" going to be something that you are
adamant on including? ;o) The reason I ask is because it's causing no end
of grief. Foremost, it precludes me from selecting the Key I wish to
encrypt a message with, relying solely on the Name and/or Address on the
To: line. What do we do when an individual has more than one Public Key
with the same address and name, such as having an RSA and DH/DSS Key?
I don't know about the others, but I much prefer the dialogue box that
appears with either PGP or GnuPGShell, allowing you to pick and choose,
and of those two I think PGP's is much slicker. That however, is probably
due to PGP being more mature than GPG.
Just my thoughts...
- --
Nick
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-=N.J. Andriash | Vancouver, B.C. Canada=-
PGP-Basics List Moderator | PGP Key ID: 0x7BA3FDCE
GnuPG v1.0.4-2 (MingW32) | TB! v1.52 Beta 11 | Win98 SE
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4-2 (MingW32)
Comment: Join PGP-Basics: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
iD8DBQE65wsuxQKEdHuj/c4RAj/RAKCbO6bqhtZihsMGJN3Du+E12hjhDACguSBr
mgjLFUIv/EnzntLwJqHrvZg=
=I7Ru
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
______________________________________________________
Archives : <http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
