Hi, Stefan Tanurkov wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
> This is why we give you a choice: either keep attachments in body and > have no problems whatsoever (maybe speed, but really big attachments do > not come often) How do you know that? Are you going to add a sticker to the Bat! package saying: May cause file loss if you try to organize attachments separately. Do not use with big attachments! Every 1st of a month I get a mail with a 8 MB attachment. I store this in two separate folders. In one folder messages are deleted after five days. The other folder keeps messages indefinitely. Every six months or so I delete the attachments from the Attachments directory. I need to keep the messages as a proof of having received them. To my surprise attachments were already gone the time a copy of the message had been removed from my short-term folder. > or keep attachments separately and live with limitations this way gives. 'Limitations' is hardly the right word. It works when my POP server feeds me dupes and I un-dupe folders. This works because every message gets its own internal ID, even if it is a dupe. Why not create a new ID when a message gets copied and have references between attachments and messages? How does it currently work? How does the Bat 'know' which attachment belongs to which message? Obviously some logic is already in place since separate attachments with the same name get unique file names. Regards, Markus -- Das beste, was aus Bayern kommt, sind die A5 und die A8. Using The Bat! 1.54 Beta/29 under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6 -- _________________________________________________________ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wish List : http://wish.thebat.dutaint.com
