Hello Gene, On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:29:27 -0400 GMT (11/07/02, 23:29 +0700 GMT), Gene Gough wrote:
GG> Perhaps this is not the same problem but it looks like it to me. Actually, no, it isn't. Technically these are two different things. GG> Perhaps I have it totally confused and if so, I am sorry but the only GG> way we work these things out is to discuss them. Thanks. I agree and will try to explain: What you are referring to are attachments (imbedded objects in an HTML mail) that were actually sent with the email. They are referenced locally, of you look at the source code. Therefore, when you receive the email, TB will show them. Once you forward these attachments, the names are being changed but the reference within the HTML code is not. Therefore, they are not being shown when you open the forwarded mail. This has been critisised as a bug, and I am inclined to agree to that assessment. The other problem is when the object is not sent with the email. It is not referenced locally, but the reference points to a URL somewhere in the www. TB will not GET (this is the technical term for downloading in this case) the object; this is not a bug but by design. If you look at the source code of the email, you see that the address of that object is not on your computer. If this is still not clear, I cannot explain it any better, and maybe someone else needs to chip in. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. "I'm not rushing into being in love. I'm finding fourth grade hard enough." (Regina, 10) Message reply created with The Bat! 1.61 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 2222 A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM _________________________________________________________ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
