Martin Webster, [MW] wrote: MW> I disagree. TBBETA is the right place to discuss TB! plug-in MW> support. You can't test them unless you discuss plug-ins too! For MW> example, the 'zero processed' issue was not a bug but the result of MW> misinterpreting information TB! passed to the plug-in. When a MW> problem occurs who's to say it's the plug-in or TB! when beta MW> testing? If you use two lists it will be much harder to assimilate MW> ideas and suggestions etc.
This seems to be an important point here. Plugin discussions are quite specialised and will interest only that small group using particular plug-ins and those who may be interested in using them. One thing that would help is to have plug-in related discussions clearly labelled as such in the subjects. For example, I'm seeing a lot of the Bayesit threads correctly having '[Bayesit]' in the subject. Those uninterested may quickly sign off. Selective download filters could then be utilized to ignore/delete messages concerning particular plug-ins etc. -- -= allie_M =- | List Moderator PGPKeys: http://www.ac-martin.com/pgpkeys.html ____________________________________ TB! v2.00.22 on WinXP Pro (SP1)
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________________ Current beta is 2.00.22 | "Using TBBETA" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
