Roman Katzer wrote: > I did use POPFile and was happy with it in spite of its' use of resources. > I switched to K9 after reading on the website http://keir.net/k9.html that > it was the compiled version of POPFile.
K9's not "the compiled version of POPFile", it's a compiled program that does something similar. See questions 2 & 3 from K9's FAQ at http://keir.net/k9_faq.html : What is the difference between K9 and POPFile? What are the advantages of K9 over POPFile and POPFile over K9? I use POPFile and like it, but it is a memory hog. > The interface is very intuitive and more convenient to use than the > POPFile interface aswell. One potential advantage to POPFile's web interface is that you can set up a manual filter in TB! that will launch a browser window positioned on the message you're currently viewing. Handy for the rare instance POPFile misses something and you need to reclassify it. I don't know if anything like that is possible in K9. -- George Using TB! 2.01.26 on Windows XP Pro 5.1, Build 2600, Service Pack 1. ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 2.01.26 | "Using TBBETA" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
