Hello Thomas Fernandez, on Sun, 21 Dec 2003 10:23:54 +0700 (2003-12-21 04:23:54 in .nl) in the message with reference <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you [TF] wrote (at least in part):
>> If it's meant for some specific use / problem / user, then it should not >> be available to the 'general' public / beta testers / at any site. TF> I understand it isn't available if you browse the directory. You can TF> download it when you have the direct link. I'm just a messenger. Don't shoot him/her. TF> Now what do you want Ritlabs to do? Introduce yet another password TF> protection, or believe that members on this beta list are mature enough TF> to not touch a beta that has not been officially announced here? Obviously members on here are not mature enough. Why else do messages about 'non-public' alphas/betas end up here ?? Yes, indeed, another password. Either protect the web-site or simply mail it to those who are concerned. TF> I think this whole discussion here is moot. If a beta is not TF> officially announced here by Ritlabs, don't download it. Easy as that. TF> I won't, that's for sure. I think this was discussed here a year or TF> two ago at length, Could be, I'm not on here that long. Do you expect me to dig through the TBBETA archive from 2 years ago? TF> I see no need for Ritlabs to ensure "other betas" hidden from us; we TF> are not little children who have to jump and download everything that TF> carries the name "beta". I'm not. TF> But then, maybe some of us are... ? See somewhere above. -- Kind regards, Peter Ouwehand E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - - Created the above using A program which insists to be : The Bat! V2.03.10 An OS which insists to be : Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 2.03.10 | "Using TBBETA" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
