On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 18:25:14 -0500, Paul Van Noord wrote: > >I fail to see why you raised this point without even making an > >attempt to confirm or contradict my experience in 3.0.2.8. > > It is inappropriate to report problems on anything other than the > latest release - for obvious reasons.
Paul, pardon me, but just because something is obvious to you does not mean that it is obvious to others. If we are talking about a heretofore unreported bug - as, to the best of my knowledge, this is - then it is very unlikely that a difference of just one or two beta releases is significant, especially when those subsequent beta releases are not even registered on the official beta download site of Ritlabs (and hence are likely to be only limited beta releases issued for testing in respect to specific bugs). Not only that, sometimes the latest beta release can be very unstable or totally unsuitable for a particular tester's personal use. That is a valid reason for dropping back to an earlier release, and it should not exclude that tester from reporting new bugs. So, pardon me, but I think it would have been more constructive if you had just confirmed or denied my bug report for 3.0.2.10 on your operating system (which is different from mine). > So, how did you find the current beta? Before downloading, I edited the shortcut to the 3.0.2.8 rar file on the Ritlabs beta download site so that it would point to 3.0.2.10. -- Avi Yashar Windows XP Pro SP2 and The Bat! Pro 3.0.2.10 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
