David,

On 22-02-2005 23:52, you [DE] wrote in
<mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
DE>>> I am sorry but it was released a alpha release.

DE> Yea and ??

I did not write what you answering. You cut out my reply to that
message.

>> That being said, I don't mind Ritlabs releasing an Alpha to the general
>> public (although it as per BS standards would be a Beta :-) ) as long as
>> it is clearly marked as such.

DE> But they follow the correct protocols.

DE> They announced it as an an alpha.

Yes they did. But again, according to BS 7925-1 (AFAIR), alpha tests
take place in-house. Anyway this is off-topic and not that interesting.

>> People (including myself) have anxiously been waiting for news from
>> Ritlabs and I suppose that they have released this version to give people
>> something to "work with".

DE> < ... >

DE> Then wait for a beta.

Which I also wrote I would. I don't know why you are suggesting I should
do what I already have said I would do?

-- 
<greeting> Best regards </greeting>  
<author> Peter Fjelsten </author> 
<thebat version> 3.0.1.33 Pro </thebat version>
<env.> ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. 
</env.>
<os> Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 </os>

  



________________________________________________________
 Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Reply via email to