Hello Roelof!

On Thursday, May 12, 2005, 5:08 PM, you wrote:

MB>> So, what happens if you change your settings to "store attachments
MB>> separately?

> In that case the file opens with its real name (I tried it), ...

Thanks for writing. I knew this, of course, since that's how I have
always stored attachments--separately.

My question was specifically to Martin Schoch and Henk M. de Bruijn,
who were maintaining that they could not get their copies of TB! to
open a file with its real name, and speculating about OS systems and
encoding issues as causes.

I wanted one of them to answer the question, Roelof, which you quoted
above, and Martin, did, of course. So he has a remedy.

But he still wants attachments which are stored with the message
bodies to open with their real names in word-processing/external text
editor applications. Whether that's technically feasible, to have the
feature behave like that, is another question.

> ... there's an easy reason for that of course. When you store
> attachments separately the file (with its correct name) already
> exists, when you store attachments in the message, before you can
> open the file there needs to be generated a temporary file first,
> for that temporary file a random file name is used.

Yes. That was clearly explained before on this thread. So now the
question is, Is that technically necessary?

If not, and it was simply a program-writing decision, the question
becomes, What are the technical advantages for the developers' having
decided to do it that way? Would changing it be a major code-writing
task, or is it something that could be changed easily? Always
provided, of course, that enough user support would be there for the
change.

-- 
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.5 Return RC9 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2






________________________________________________________
 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/9 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Reply via email to