Hi Alexander On Friday, May 13, 2005 5:13:19 PM you wrote:
>>> Actually, I like this distinction. I want to know if I'm working with a >>> file that I actually did save to disk, or if I'm looking at a temporary >>> extraction/preview. >> I don't like how it's now. Because you can work faster if the opened file >> has already the original file name. You can edit/store it immediately >> with the application which was started when you clicked the attachment. > Then switch your attachment storage to separate files and you have what you > want. As described - then you are filling up this directory with _all_ files you get with this account. And exactly this I don't want. > This discussion lacks substance because it is only about personal > preferences. Are you a moderator to tell others what they have write here or not and which messages have "substances" and which not. So please! > A couple of guys like it this way, a couple of other guys like > it the other way. Its impossible to please everyone. Other email clients (OE, Outlook, Thunderbird, Gemini, 40tude...) open a file with the original name. And no - I don't want to take an other one. -- Best regards, Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] TheBat! 3.5 Return RC9 on Windows 2000 5.0 2195 Service Pack 4
pgp41oCUMn2dR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/9 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
