sábado, 20 ago 2005 at 15:53, it seems you wrote: > However, BayesIt still does a lousy job. It hardly ever finds any spam > after a couple of months. I use K9 on my main machine, which seems a > lot more efficient.
Well, I don't doubt K9 could be more effective than BayesIt! But I like the integration of it, and my results in last month are not bad. Only a 2.46% of fails. Last month statistic General numbers ° Spam traffic (bytes): 4172965 ° Spam emails: 1139 ° NON-spam traffic (bytes): 42530489 ° NON-spam letters: 1915 ° Total traffic (bytes): 46703454 ° Total letters: 3054 ° Spam percentage of emails: 37.3%. ° Spam percentage of traffic (bytes): 8.94%. Errors ° SPAM errors (emails): 2.46%. ° SPAM errors (traffic): 5.71%. ° NON-spam errors (emails): 0%. ° NON-spam errors (traffic): 0%. ° Total errors (emails): 0.92%. ° Total errors (traffic): 0.51%. -- /\ / Using The Bat! 3.60.02 Forerunner (Beta) Professional / \ / \ / Windows XP (5.1.2600 Service Pack 1) / \/ e t \/ i c i o u s Plugins: BayesIt! 0.8.1 and miniRelayPlug 0.05.50 ........................ Last 24 hour Spam% it's 35% Moderator of Spanish TBUDL Spanish Translation Coordinator of The Bat! ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.60.02 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
