Hello all,
Saturday, August 20, 2005, NetVicious wrote:

>> However, BayesIt still does a lousy job. It hardly ever finds any spam
>> after a couple of months. I use K9 on my main machine, which seems a
>> lot more efficient.

> Well, I don't doubt K9 could be more effective than BayesIt!
> But I like the integration of it, and my results in last month are not
> bad. Only a 2.46% of fails.

I am testing new AGAVA AntispamServant plugin for The Bat! for a week
and after two days of learning I have no false positive yet. It is fast
and looks very good.

But it is a shareware, discounted price for TB users is 20$ or 15eur.

-- 

Bye

Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz

Using the best The Bat! 3.60.02 Forerunner (Beta)
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Notebook Acer, Pentium4-M 2.2 GHz, 512 MB RAM, ADSL line

 


________________________________________________________
 Current beta is 3.60.02 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Reply via email to