Hello Alto, ST>> It's not TB's behaviour, it's MicroEd's behaviour. If you don't ST>> like MicroEd's behaviour, you can use Windows editor.
> The windows-editor doesn't know a thing about quote handling, > reformating or many other features intrinsic for writing emails. > Intrinsic to me, that is. Well, this is because quote handling and reformatting suitable for line-oriented plain text editor. Paragraph-oriented editor can provide some similar functionality if it provides rich text editing, but if output is plain text, we have problems when storing a message as a draft and then open it for editing later - plain text does not store rich text formatting. ST>> The behaviour you want from MicroEd cannot be implemented there ST>> because it does not use "soft" linefeeds. If it will start using ST>> soft linefeeds, it will become Windows Editor and will have ST>> different functionality. That's what I'm trying to say. > I disagree. Take the editor of any other email-program: Every one of > those performs adequate in this matter, with no problems at all. Do they provide quote handling and reflowing the same way MicroEd does? > Besides, "soft-LF" most certainly cannot be the reason of the dilemma: > The problem is rather that MicroEd removes hard-CRs. Each line in MicroEd ends with hard linefeed, MicroEd does not know anything about soft linefeeds. So a paragraph in MicroEd is a set of lines delimited by two empty lines. This is what "line-oriented" means. I have an idea how to make MicroEd using soft linefeeds and keep its existing features, but this requires writing a new editor, which is obviously not a one day/week/month hard job. I hope it will be done at last, but don't know when. -- Best regards, Stefan ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.62.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
