--On Wednesday, January 17, 2007 8:17 AM, Stuart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have never used Mulberry, but I understand it was built > from the ground up to be IMAP and doesn't have the same capabilities > as TB! That's one of Mulberry's strengths is that it was built specifically for IMAP (although I hear that it does POP3 very well, too). Because of this specialization, it pretty much can't be beat when it comes to hardcore IMAP usage. Many people don't like it, however, due to the fact that the interface is, well, rather outdated (although incredibly intuitive once you learn how to, uh, intuit it). I'd stick with Mulberry if it wasn't for the fact that I like the look-and-feel of The Bat! better. Plus The Bat! has a number of features that Mulberry doesn't. -- :R.
pgpeS4I5tDzAA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.95.08 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
