Hi Maxim, On Thu, 17 May 2007 00:13:07 +0300 UTC (5/16/2007, 4:13 PM -0500 UTC my time), Maxim Masiutin wrote:
>>>It is a problem in that it is a matter of convenience to the user. Where the >>>user can always connect otherwise using a standard connection on 143 (in >>>most cases, depending if the IMAP server is set up that way, or standard POP >>>on 110). M> I don't understand why don't you connect with regular (non-TLS) IMAP if M> the TLS IMAP has an invalid certificate? in my case, I have one remote server that only runs on 993, not 143. >>>To put it another way, if I can connect to a server via POP or IMAP, after I >>>authenticate, why will it not let me connect securely, when I can connect >>>normally. It should be my choice, since I can connect anyway. Does that not >>>makes sense? M> If you have an invalid certificate, than you are not connecting M> securely, even if you are using TLS. Belive or not, with an invalid M> certificate, no confidentiality or integrity is assured. So just switch M> to regular (non-TLS) IMAP and be happy! :-)) can't as above :) I have to use Stunnel to do this currently. -- Gary ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.99.06 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
