Hello Marek, On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:49:47 +0100 GMT (24/02/2008, 18:49 +0700 GMT), Marek Mikus wrote:
Good morning. You were up late last night, I didn't expect a reply so fast. Thanks. MM> once developers accept such opinion, "nobody" will use correct MM> certs then, everybody (including You) will confirm warning window MM> instead changing certificate, because it is easier. That is their problem and mine, not yours. Besides, all (or at least many) email clients provide this option. So the internet will not blow just because TB! provides it too. MM> Or do You have different reason to require this instead You are MM> lazy to change certificate? Yes. See my example in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] There is no new cert, because the sysad is on vacation. That's just an example. In fact, I don't need to defend myelf to ask for an option, even though you might not want to use it. Why are people so vehemently against options, just because they don't want to use them? Especially options that other email clients offer. Are you trying to save the internet by disallowing this in TB!? -- Cheers, Thomas. INFLATION: Cutting money in half without damaging the paper. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.0.14.5 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 4.0.14.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
