Hello All. Am I alone in thinking that the Synchronise function does not behave correctly? It is my opinion that synchronisation should merge two legitimate message databases, and produce a legitimate version which will contain any changes made in both original versions. An example might help!!
I log in to The Bat on my PC in the morning, read messages and reply to a few. During the day I use Voyager on a memory stick and read any new messages etc. On the way home during a long train journey I tidy up the folders deleting some messages. On my return home, the "Synchronise" function works - apart from re constituting the messages that I'd deleted when I tidied the folders. In database synchronisation the function is based on the time-stamps of each transaction. Shouldn't it be the same with the Bat. I deliberately deleted many messages at 3pm, so why were these folders repopulated with the contents as at 9am. If I had wanted to recover from a damaged message base, that's what Backup and Restore are for. On a very positive note, I'm finding Voyager much more reliable than previous versions - I no longer need a "backup" EMail system as I'm now confident in The Bat/Voyager combination.. Best regards, Hamish mailto:ham...@albanach.net ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 4.2.7.1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
