-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Brian,
On 20 January 2001 at 05:58:47 -0500 (which was 10:58 where I live)
Brian Clark wrote and made these points:
L>> Oh Jesus... here we go again:
BC> SooOOOoo hostile. ;-) You sound like someone I know on another list.
Okay folks - let's veer away from the "personal" here please.
L>> A bit of mess, right? :)
BC> Yes. And the funny thing is, I don't see ANY of that unless I press
BC> Ctrl+Shift+K
I believe that Lija's point is that these headers are somewhat
verbose, redundant and represent a theft of bandwidth, whether they
are visible or not. And, do you know, I actually agree with (him?).
BC> I suspect Marck will be shooting this horse very soon.
I am shooting the horse indeed, but only on TBUDL and not before
saying that Lija has my full sympathy and I will be discussing the
removal of these headers with Syafril as soon as he emerges. Their
purpose is moot since TB doesn't support these list traffic headers.
Having said that, they are part of a standard. I'm not sure if it's
RFC - anyone know? If so, please reply on TBTECH only.
- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA / TBTECH
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com ]
[ Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs ]
TB! v1.49c S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8 Secured
Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness
iQA/AwUBOml4eznkJKuSnc2gEQJ/+gCguUmvWFnSWiXFNFT9338xUxgvBqsAoOHL
vSz59qe4VNBs875bhy/2tvrw
=KHiW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
______________________________________________________
Archives : <http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
