-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Peter,

On  20  January  2001 at 13:33:41 +0100 (which was 12:33 where I live)
Peter Steiner wrote and made these points:

MDP>> Having  said  that, they are part of a standard. I'm not sure if
MDP>> it's RFC - anyone know? If so, please reply on TBTECH only.

PS> IIRC RFC2369

Thanks  for  that.  Does anyone else have any strong feeling about our
support of this RFC? I know that I feel that we're soaking up too much
bandwidth  on  the  lists.  To that end I recently trimmed the message
footer by three lines and thinned their content.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA / TBTECH
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com      ]
[    Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs           ]

TB! v1.49c S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8 Secured
Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness

iQA/AwUBOmmLzTnkJKuSnc2gEQJ0dQCeN9vHbH2ebkd4YpYef7BQINswMCMAoM7r
O6iAwIVjDB53IhT77yZyc0WZ
=Vn97
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
______________________________________________________
Archives   : <http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

You are subscribed as : [email protected]


Reply via email to