-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Peter,
On 20 January 2001 at 13:33:41 +0100 (which was 12:33 where I live)
Peter Steiner wrote and made these points:
MDP>> Having said that, they are part of a standard. I'm not sure if
MDP>> it's RFC - anyone know? If so, please reply on TBTECH only.
PS> IIRC RFC2369
Thanks for that. Does anyone else have any strong feeling about our
support of this RFC? I know that I feel that we're soaking up too much
bandwidth on the lists. To that end I recently trimmed the message
footer by three lines and thinned their content.
- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA / TBTECH
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com ]
[ Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs ]
TB! v1.49c S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8 Secured
Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness
iQA/AwUBOmmLzTnkJKuSnc2gEQJ0dQCeN9vHbH2ebkd4YpYef7BQINswMCMAoM7r
O6iAwIVjDB53IhT77yZyc0WZ
=Vn97
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
______________________________________________________
Archives : <http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You are subscribed as : [email protected]