hi
Wednesday, September 12, 2001, 10:54:58 AM:
mt>> You all know how this is gonna end: USA will bomb some innocent
mt>> country
> They may bomb a country that was not directly involved but I doubt
> that many of the victims of such an action will be "innocent". The
> target will doubtless be a haven for terrorists. This act has made
> such places legitimate targets by anyone on the planet who believes in
> freedom.
Oh, so you think, that _all_ the people in some country are guilty? Or
do you expect the innocent people to leave the country and you're
going to pay for the trip and a new place to live for them?
This action was performed by a moderately small group of terrorists,
who _could_ be backed up by a moderately small group of politians from
some country. That's not a reason enough to bomb a whole country.
mt>> to satisfy it's people's need for blood; more funding will go to
mt>> the military, inteligence and espionage; more freedom will be
mt>> taken away from the people of USia.
mt>> They don't know it yet, but USians will be hurt much more deeply
mt>> than it's ever possible with a plane crashing. Now they will be
mt>> _protected_ for _their_own_good_. It'll be a disaster.
> You clearly don't understand the democratic system.
You clearly need to open your eyes, because this is already happening
and will just get deeper. Ever heard of Echelon?
mt>> And one more thing: why is it with people, so after such accident
mt>> they think they need to spend _more_ on inteligence and security?
mt>> They _know_ it doesn't work! Airport security is strict already,
> No it isn't. Not by UK standards. Here in the UK we're much better at
> it having fought IRA terrorism for years.
Well, it's probably not the strictest in the world, but it _is_
strict. But you might be right, it can be stricter, I just don't think
stricter is always better.
mt>> And don't get me wrong, I feel much sympathy for the hurt ones,
mt>> for their families. It's just their government that pisses me off.
> Now is *NOT* the time to say such things. It seems to me that you
> may have a bad attitude born of years of exposure to anti-American
> propaganda.
Actually, I've never been exposed to anti-american propaganda. There
_was_ a lot of it back in the old days, but it mostly disapeared in
1980-81 when the things changed here. Now there is _a_lot_ of
_pro_-american propaganda everywhere.
I don't know if you're an american, but you need to open your eyes
really badly.
> All governments "piss people off", it's a peculiar trait of the
> American one. There's not a good one anywhere. Truly! It's the
> nature of power to invite disrespect.
It's not my problem, that they annoy people. My problem is that they
annoy people from other countries than USA.
If you need examples, look at Middle-East, at Columbia, at Iraq, and
at basicly any other country USia sticks it's finger in.
!FUT WARNING!
Let's move this off the list please.
--
m.tatarynowicz
yourc s.a.
kids are violent because of the movies? there's so much comedy on television. does
that cause comedy in the streets? (Dick Cavett)
--
______________________________________________________
Archives : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
