On Sunday, March 09, 2003 at 15:45:18GMT +0000 (which was 10:45 AM where I live) David Elliott wrote and made these points on the subject of "Bayesian spam filtering": DE> On 09 March 2003 at 10:15:43 -0500 (which was 15:15 where I live) David DE> Calvarese graced us with these comments
<SNIPPAGE> DE> < ... > DC>> I prefer using SpamPal for doing the spam filtering as it can query DC>> spamcop and other services, has black and white lists, and has plugins DC>> to handle other filtering methods (such as Bayesian). DE> I found SpamPal to be unreliable it would lockup sometimes (up to 3 times a DE> day) DE> When It ran it was good. I've not had any problems with SpamPal yet... If you happen to be on TBOT, I just posted an question about Spampal and Popfile. Nor am I adverse to switching to Popfile if it really is better and provides some real benefit. -- Best regards, David "It is a fine thing to have ability, but the ability to discoverability in others is the true test." - Elbert Hubbard Using The Bat! v1.62i on Windows 98 4.10 Build 2222 A ________________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBTECH" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
