On Sunday, March 09, 2003 at 16:13:49GMT +0000 (which was 11:13 AM where I live) David Elliott wrote and made these points on the subject of "Bayesian spam filtering": DE> Salutation David
DE> On 09 March 2003 at 10:55:22 -0500 (which was 15:55 where I live) David DE> Calvarese might have written DC>>>> I prefer using SpamPal for doing the spam filtering as it can query DC>>>> spamcop and other services, has black and white lists, and has plugins DC>>>> to handle other filtering methods (such as Bayesian). DE>>> I found SpamPal to be unreliable it would lockup sometimes (up to 3 DE>>> times a day) DE>>> When It ran it was good. DC>> I've not had any problems with SpamPal yet... If you happen to be on DC>> TBOT, I just posted an question about Spampal and Popfile. DE> Reply posted. DC>> Nor am I adverse to switching to Popfile if it really is better and DC>> provides some real benefit. DE> If I could run both I would as work on different principals. Well, the Popfile forum has a way to use the two together, with spampal getting the email from popfile... http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=810183&forum_id=234504 -- Best regards, David "�Stay� is a charming word in a friend's vocabulary." - Bronson Allcott Using The Bat! v1.62i on Windows 98 4.10 Build 2222 A ________________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBTECH" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
