Hello Terry, On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 13:31:34 -0400 (24.08.2004 23:31 my local time), received Tuesday, August 24, 2004 at 23:42:59 +0600, you wrote about "I'm fed up with ..." at least in part:
TF> Is 2.x better? Yes TF> What are the limits in terms of syncing subfolders and such. Well, for some of us it works not such fast (on same folder tree) as, for example, Thunderbird or Mulberry. Probably - it eats most CPU on sync process (I see it) It _can_ have glitches with some IMAP-daemons (you can search BT in IMAP category for others problems) TF> Is the IMAP functionality of 2.x documented anywhere? Can't recall help changes, but, I suppose "Nowhere in deep" will be correct definition -- Best regards, Alexander ________________________________________________________ http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
