Hi Ali -
Monday, September 27, 1999, 10:30:33 PM, you wrote:
>> It's easy to get spoiled by Agent. :-) I agree that this is one of
>> many Agent features that would greatly enhance the usability of TB.
>> Agent is not a bloated app, and I think that many of it's features
>> could be rolled into TB without making it a bloated app. Sure it's
>> going to be larger than if the features weren't rolled in, but where
>> do you draw the line?
AM> Well, IMHO, what is it that we most commonly do when managing e-mail?
AM> We download mail and compose new mail or reply to mail. A good message
AM> editor with great features will make or break the app and this is
AM> especially so if you've experienced good quality where that is
AM> concerned.
AM> I consider Agent to be far from bloated. It's the most stable app that
AM> I've used and it really does nothing more than what it was designed to
AM> do. It does it without the usual bells and whistles. It reminds me lot
AM> of TB! in this regard. No unnecessary HTML support and other feature
AM> support that may be provided by external apps that are usually installed
AM> on a users system. A Great MIME types applet setup is provided for this.
AM> It's URL management configurations applet is really nice so you could
AM> use whatever browser you wish.
I agree with you 100%. I could name five or six features of Agent
that I would like to see rolled into TB without even having to think
about it.
(I think you may have misinterpreted my original message. I'm _for_
adding features. I think it would take a lot to "bloat" TB.)
--
Mark Worsham mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Plano, TX USA
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, click below and send the generated message.
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
