Hi all,
On Sunday, October 03, 1999, 6:02:26 PM (-5 GMT), Claude scribbled:
AM>> The point is that if someone were
AM>> to innocently write to you and place '>' signs for whatever reason in
AM>> the body of their text problems may arise. If the '>' appears within the
AM>> first twenty characters of the line it is treated as a quote prefix and
AM>> the reply quote prefix placed inappropriately in front of it.
> Wouldn't this pb be solved with the same idea I had within the thread
> I related?
> It was to change the actual rule "If there is a '>' in the beginning
> of the line AND the first char is not a sp, quote" to "If there is a
> '>' in the line AND no sp before it, quote".
Yes it would!
--
Regards,
-=Ali=-
>>> As easy as 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716 <<<
*---------------------------------------------------------------*
Using The Bat! 1.36 Beta/9 on Windows NT 4.0 (Service Pack 5)
*---------------------------------------------------------------*
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, click below and send the generated message.
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
