Hi Steve,
on Thursday, November 18, 1999, 11:11:47 PM GMT+0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
>> Does anybody second the motion, so we can put it on the (mysterious, as
>> never seen or published) wish-list?
SL> No. Because it works as expected.
Not as expected by me.
SL> Quite frankly, I just shook my head and sighed when I saw your
SL> initial message because, well, it was idiotic.
I always love your down-to-earth factual replies. ;-)
SL> Of course a new message is going to have you enter the header
SL> information first. MUAs have been doing this since there *have*
SL> been MUAs.
I don't even know what an MUA is. But I don't understand why the
cursor has to be in the header if the information is already complete.
This is the gist of my posting.
SL> To change that behavior for your personal whims would be to break
SL> expected behavior for the benefit minuscule minority of one...
SL> you.
The purpose of my posting this msg on the list was to determine
whether it is true that I am this "miniscule minority". And, once
again, I have to admire your empirical database. How do you know that
I am? Maybe any rules ("MUA's"?) that were made about a century ago
are not appreciated by today's crowd? Are we not open to discuss
ideas?
Looking forward to your factual reply. :-)
--
Ciao,
Thomas.
Message reply created with The Bat! 1.37 Beta/3
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
on a Pentium II/350 MHz.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
