Hallo Ali,
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999 23:57:43 -0500GMT,
which was Tuesday, December 14, 1999, 12:57:43 PM (GMT+0800) my local time,
Ali Martin wrote:
AM> [....]
AM>>> As you can see in my greeting, it works nicely. Check the RFC
AM>>> Headers for your message and see. :)
>> Wow, it works! even I don't know how it work :-).
AM> Alexander thinks it's a piece of cake. :)))
As a matter of fact, I would like a macro in addition to the %ODate
and %OTime macros we have. So it can be chosen whether we want the
"real" additional date/time of the sender, or the date/date after
"conversion" into our time zone.
On a list like this, the "real" time makes more sense. In a business
environment, the lcoal time seems to be the preferred one. You cannot
expect the average user to understand RegExpr's.
--
Cheers,
Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message reply created with The Bat! 1.38e
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
using an Intel Celeron 366 Mhz, 128MB RAM
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
