Morning Alexander V. Kiselev,
> It's *very* easy indeed to convert AW: to Re:, but I cannot see
> how is it possible to convert AW: to Re[n]:.... TB's regexps
> currently don't allow replacing, only straightforward matching:-(
From the new version announcement of 1.38:
[+] %REPLYCOUNTER/%ORERPLYCOUNTER to generate "Re[n]:" text
accordingly to the count of replies (can be useful for generated
subject fields).
So, I was wondering if this could possibly be used together with
regexps.
> But guys, I've already done my share of regexping TB, *you*
> are using it, *i* don't (since i'm still riding the winged horse:-)).
> Anybody else volunteering?
Sure, I'll do it. If you teach me, that is :-P
--
+--Jast............................
|on Windows 98 4.10 Build 2222 A
:with The Bat! 1.38e
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
