Hi there!
On 16 Dec 99, at 14:35, Jast wrote
about "Re[2]: re's and regexp's":
> > It's *very* easy indeed to convert AW: to Re:, but I cannot see
> > how is it possible to convert AW: to Re[n]:.... TB's regexps
> > currently don't allow replacing, only straightforward matching:-(
>
> From the new version announcement of 1.38:
>
> [+] %REPLYCOUNTER/%ORERPLYCOUNTER to generate "Re[n]:" text
> accordingly to the count of replies (can be useful for generated
> subject fields).
>
> So, I was wondering if this could possibly be used together with
> regexps.
I don't see how:-( Of course, if TB regexps supported
replacing... But as it is -- nope.
>
> Sure, I'll do it. If you teach me, that is :-P
Well, I'll bet it's simplier for _you_ to learn regexp syntax then
for me... That due to the (sad) fact that all the regexp manuals
are written in English. I'd sure prefer them to be written in
Russian, of course:-)
--
SY, Alex
(St.Petersburg, Russia)
http://mph.phys.spbu.ru/~akiselev
---
Thought for the day:
If you don't like my opinion of you - improve yourself!
---
PGP public keys on keyservers:
0xA2194BF9 (RSA); 0x214135A2 (DH/DSS)
fingerprints:
F222 4AEF EC9F 5FA6 7515 910A 2429 9CB1 (RSA)
A677 81C9 48CF 16D1 B589 9D33 E7D5 675F 2141 35A2 (DH/DSS)
---
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
