Hi there!
On 27 Jan 00, at 13:52, Steve Lamb wrote
about "Re: PGP Bug?":
I fully support the suggestion of Steve. BTW, AFAIK this is already on the
wishlist (?). This technique has proved to be quite useful I'd say. It's one of the
pretty useful and pretty standard things that TB doesn't support yet but the
other MUAs do (e.g., Pegasus);-(
> Or replace it with the applicable rfc2369 information.
>
> Network Working Group G. Neufeld
> Request for Comments: 2369 Nisto
> Category: Standards Track J. Baer
> SkyWeyr Technologies
> July 1998
>
>
> The Use of URLs as Meta-Syntax for Core Mail List Commands
> and their Transport through Message Header Fields
--
SY, Alex
(St.Petersburg, Russia)
http://mph.phys.spbu.ru/~akiselev
---
Thought for the day:
Everyone should believe in something -- I believe I'll have
another drink.
---
PGP public keys on keyservers:
0xA2194BF9 (RSA); 0x214135A2 (DH/DSS)
fingerprints:
F222 4AEF EC9F 5FA6 7515 910A 2429 9CB1 (RSA)
A677 81C9 48CF 16D1 B589 9D33 E7D5 675F 2141 35A2 (DH/DSS)
---
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
