Hi there!
On 27 Jan 00, at 14:10, Steve Lamb wrote
about "Re: PGP Bug?":
> > I fully support the suggestion of Steve. BTW, AFAIK this is already on the
> > wishlist (?). This technique has proved to be quite useful I'd say. It's one of
>the
> > pretty useful and pretty standard things that TB doesn't support yet but the
> > other MUAs do (e.g., Pegasus);-(
>
> For the record I learned about it from the list server listar. I'm not
> sure what other list servers implement it. I don't believe TB!'s list server
> does.
Listserv and Lyris do support this RFC. Don't know about the others. Anyhow,
eventually all will do. Unless M$ makes it's own list server software;-)
--
SY, Alex
(St.Petersburg, Russia)
http://mph.phys.spbu.ru/~akiselev
---
Thought for the day:
If you have to travel on a Titanic, why not go first-class?
---
PGP public keys on keyservers:
0xA2194BF9 (RSA); 0x214135A2 (DH/DSS)
fingerprints:
F222 4AEF EC9F 5FA6 7515 910A 2429 9CB1 (RSA)
A677 81C9 48CF 16D1 B589 9D33 E7D5 675F 2141 35A2 (DH/DSS)
---
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
