AM>>> The next thing is that no-one is *telling* you not to use the
AM>>> signature that *you* like. But there is one very logical issue here. I
AM>>> would assume that you include a signature for your readers to
AM>>> understand right and not simply for you to admire. If they don't
AM>>> understand it, then why include it? Frankly, if I were in your place,
AM>>> I'd thank the readership for indicating to me that my signature is
AM>>> coming across as unreadable gibberish because that's clearly not my
AM>>> intention. Is it yours?
t> If I read the string of mails correctly the many remarks / cinmplaints
t> werent about the contents of the signature but mainly that receivered
t> didnt have a clue what it meant due to all of us using different
t> fonts.
t> And explaining it in a poem doesnt help as the same fonts will show
t> every character as it was in the signature...
t> It was a nice short signature, just that almost nobody could read it(g)
t> Best regards,
t> tracer
t> Using theBAT 1.39 with Windows 98
t> mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t> I am using FireTalk: 321338
t> ICQ: on request
t> Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
whatever man. let it go.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
