Hello Allie,
Tuesday, February 15, 2000, 7:28:31 PM, you wrote:
>> That's true. You can see it when attaching a very large file to a
>> new message via the "attach a file" button. Using d&d it works
>> well.
AM> Funny I just attached a 30MB file using the attach file
AM> toolbar button with no problem. Where exactly does the problem with
AM> attaching using this method occur?
It takes a long time, TB uses loads of memory, sometimes you get to
see that "memory exhausted" dialog. Then sometimes TB crashes... but
sometimes, it works after all.
>> About receiving mail... I've not seen TB fault on this, but I've
>> sometimes got the impression that throughput is poor with large
>> mails. Receiving a mail of, say, 8 MB seems to take significantly
>> longer than ftping a file that size. I didn't doublecheck with a
>> stopwatch, so I can't give values.
AM> Is that really a fair comparison?
As I meant a file that has 8MB when already base64-encoded, I don't
know why it shouldn't be.
Best regards,
Oliver mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
