Hello Allie Martin,
On Mon, 14 Feb 2000 18:55:06  -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, February 15, 2000, 6:55:06 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Allie Martin wrote:


>>   Yes, I'm a bad, bad boy for sending email that big.  Who cares.
>> Fix the problem.  Why should TB! use in excess of 192 megs of ram
>> when trying to import (or open) an email with a 8 meg attachment?!

>         This problem is as you say old. Since I don't practice sending
> large e-mail attachments <g>, I can only give second hand information.
> It was said that dragging and dropping the attachment anywhere unto
> the TB! main window creates a new message with the attachment without
> hassle.

correct, thats the way I always did it so I never knew with big
attachments I wasnt getting the problem since I ftp....
Until I verified it on my system...
Using the menus to select a file or drag and dump isnt the same...
By far the recommended way to transmit large amounts of data and if
you do have to email it, use winrar, set it to split and make an SFX.
All the receiver has to do is to run the exe to recombine/expand the
file.

By the way windows also doesnt behave the same in many related
actions.

So the real problem could be even in Windows in that one of their
routines used doesnt work as well as the other one does.

Best regards,
 
tracer
-- 

Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/3 with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request 
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational



-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------


You are subscribed as : [email protected]

Reply via email to