On Thursday, May 18, 2000, CaLViN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Assume there are two identical mails. One of them is read, the other
> one is not. The Bat! deletes the read one, leaving me without dupes,
> but with mails flagged as unread although I've already read their
> (killed) dupe...
>
> Is this intended behavior or just coincidence? If the second, should
> there be a rule which message to be deleted?
I haven't been concerned with the read/unread status, but I have
noticed situations in which TB deleted the first-received message and
left the later message (which had a much later received date). I
would prefer to have the first message kept and the later duplicate message
deleted.
Ron Mura
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
