Hi Johannes,
On Wed, 9 Aug 2000 21:09:41 +0200GMT (10/08/2000, 03:09 +0800GMT),
Johannes M. Posel wrote:
JMP> I owe you a beer ;)
Anytime. :-)
JMP> To be honest I cannot really believe you only get 1kb (this would be a
JMP> connect at *less* than 9600bps, which is what you get here when you're
JMP> surfing with your GSM mobile)!
Remember 2400bps? Those were the times... <g>
>> Granted. But no reason to unnecessary blow up a message to 300% of
>> it's original size with a 4K "signature".
JMP> While I really don't want to insult you, what do you consider "normal"
JMP> mail size? Don't forget 'bout the headers, too. Mail with 1k (normal
JMP> cluster size) is not what I call normal. 4-6k, even 10k seems normal
JMP> to me...
No, what I mean is, it depends of the inormation content. If a message
has 1.2K without the s/mime and is blown up by 300% for the signature,
it's not nomral. If a message has 10K of information, that's OK.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Message reply created with The Bat! 1.45
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
on a Pentium II/350 MHz.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
