Hi starc,
> I had this rule all the time and it didn't work. But now I know
> why :) The problem is, this was my second filter rule and now I
> took a closer look, and there is an option that says "continue
> processing with other rules" that has to be checked, and it
> wasn't
It has to be checked only when you other rules to be applied to the
messages that has been handled by the first rule. It won't prevent
other rules to be applied to other messages (that don't match the
first rule).
If indeed enabling the option solves your problem, then the first
rule is preempting the second rule, meaning you've probably had too
broad a filter definition for the first rule.
> (a bad default in my opinion).
It's a good default for me (and I guess you'll agree if understand
what exactly the option means), since few of my messages have to be
handled by more than one rule.
--
Best regards,
Ming-Li
The Bat! 1.46 Beta/3 | Win2k SP1
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
