-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 14 Sep 2000 16:02:43 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:

>> <cough> PMMail as a straightforward multi-account e-mail system is
>> comparable. Once you start moving to advanced features, PMMail in
>> general becomes a shadow of TB!. I used PMMail for a longer time than
>> I've been using TB!. :-)

SL>     Aside from templates what does TB! really do better?

You're asking me to put aside, perhaps, the single most significant
reason why I use TB! over PMMail. I cannot just put it aside like that
and continue the argument. :-)

Oh, I got my hands on a pro version of PMMail and went through it's PGP
implementation. It's different from TB!'s and it does some things
better. TB! also does some things better with PGP as well. :-)

- --
A. Curtis Martin..
Moderator TBUDL/TBBETA  |  PGP Key ID: 0xEE079937
PGP Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendAlliePGPKey
- ---
** "Hell, if you understood everything I said, you'd be me! "
________________________________________________________
Using TB! v1.46 Beta/5 �� Win2k Pro SP1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Digitally signed for message and sender verification.

iQA/AwUBOcFg9/AXeSHuB5k3EQJabgCeJxV5WE2rGpgxQvZgTKX/Q6c+J4UAnRt3
caX3vsrCCbLmzaiNqxzssr/4
=Fkrj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------

You are subscribed as : [email protected]


Reply via email to