On Sunday, September 17, 2000 at 7:57 PM or thereabouts, A . Curtis
Martin wrote the following about Steve Lamb has left the building:
---------- [snip] ---------->8
ACM> There's no real celebrating in moderator land as such. I
ACM> personally got a headache over the whole thing. It was quite
ACM> difficult. I do share your view that Steve did contribute
ACM> positively to the list and I myself adopted his proposed method
ACM> of spam filtering, but your initial statement hit the nail on
ACM> the head, in that Steve can be his own worst enemy. His
ACM> negative side was just too intolerable and, IMHO, had an
ACM> overall negative effect. It was only a matter of time.
---------- [snip] ---------->8
Am I alone in feeling that continuing to talk about someone after
they're gone, rather than just the situation (i.e., rules) is also
inappropriate? (Not picking on this response, Allie, except that it
was merely the most recently received in the thread.)
But can we let it die? Please? This just feels so improper to me
somehow. What's done is done, whatever individual feelings about it
may be.
Chuck
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Chuck Mattsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mindspring.com/~mattsen
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Random Thought/Quote for this Message:
A feature is a bug with seniority.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
