Hallo Charlie,
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 06:45:32 +1100 GMT (25/11/2000, 03:45 +0800 GMT),
Charlie Laidlaw wrote:
JA>> This is not a reliable check. TB will automatically *create* a plain
JA>> text version if there is only a HTML version. The only way to check
JA>> is to export the message to a Unix mailbox and view it with a text
JA>> editor (eg Notepad).
CL> yeah, all i see is the kludges then the message surrounded by html
CL> gibberish (well to me it is :)
Watch out for this:
CL> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On an HTML mail, it will show Content-type: HTML/alternative (good) or
HTML/multipart (not good).
(Speaking of my cookie: I'm into the fourth.)
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
-Everyone needs belief in something. I believe I'll have another beer.
Message reply created with The Bat! 1.48 Beta/8
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
using an Intel Celeron 366Mhz, 128MB RAM
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
