Hello Ming-Li,
(ML == "Ming-Li") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ML> As Jamie pointed out, 64 MB RAM is a little marginal for Win2k to
ML> work efficiently. I have a slightly slower CPU (200 MHz PPro, no
ML> MMX), but with 96 MB RAM, I believe my machine run smoother than
ML> yours, in general. At such low end level, 32 MB makes a huge
ML> difference.
ML> I do run into access violations, but very rarely (slightly more
ML> often when using Win98). I'm not sure it's because you have too
ML> little RAM or there're other factors at play.
FYI, I'm running 98 SE with PII 401mhz / 256 Mb SDRAM and I have yet to see an
access violation (other than the PGP mix-up which was due to S/MIME
being check alongside PGP).
Being a former Eudora user, I can say that TB! is light-speed in
comparison in every way.
I feel liberated,
-Brian (*crossing fingers*)
--
Man who pee on electric fence receive shocking news.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
