-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello Ming-Li!
On Thursday, November 30, 2000 at 3:21:58 PM you wrote:
> I also came from OE (5.0), and I'm pretty sure TB is faster than
> OE5, in general or when handling large folders. I also have a few
> archive folder of that size or bigger. While they are certainly
> slower than my regular folders, I don't feel it slower than OE, if
> memory serves.
That I could test every day in the office - I am the only one running
TB!, some run Eudora and Calypso, most OE or its big brother - and TB!
is definitely much faster in every aspect except for crashing.
> I do run into access violations, but very rarely (slightly more
> often when using Win98). I'm not sure it's because you have too
> little RAM or there're other factors at play.
AFAIR I never had an access violation due to TB!, neither at home where
TB! runs usually for short times (about 4 h max) or in the office, where
it runs about 10 to 12 h a day.
- --
Dierk Haasis
PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys
The Bat 1.47 Halloween Edition
Windows 95 4.0 1212 C
Lebe inkonsistent
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt
Comment: To further and enhance security for everybody!
iQA/AwUBOiaMkvTo1oA8g8dLEQIbWQCgj+KO53Fg9lAFsLC6H0rHKR35NnQAnA9w
hyWiRUi1vo4l2ha51QVJSFyU
=JheT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
